Rand Paul calls out Democrat kangaroo Court in the House and said all witnesses must be called and not just their witnesses

Kerry Picket:
On Wednesday, Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) responded to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler’s (D-NY) accusation that the Senate is engaging in an “unconstitutional and disgusting cover-up” if it did not allow the introduction of all witnesses in President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.

“If the Senate doesn’t permit the introduction of all relevant witnesses and of all documents that the House wants to introduce, because the House is the prosecutor here, then the Senate is — is engaging in an unconstitutional and disgusting cover-up,” Nadler said.

“Well, it’s kind of interesting,” Paul responded on Fox News’ “Your World with Neil Cavuto”. “The comment is that all relevant witnesses. Would he agree that Hunter Biden is relevant, that Joe Biden’s relevant, and that the whistleblower’s relevant?”

“My guess is no. They want all witnesses that they want. And they don’t want any witnesses that the president wants,” Paul continued. “So, I say this. Either allow all witnesses, all witnesses that the president’s defense team deems necessary to their defense, or no witnesses. We’re not going to do a kangaroo court, like they did in the House. The House only produced witnesses that Adam Schiff agreed to.”
...
This challenge to the Democrats' bad faith coup attempt against the President is called for and other GOP Senators appear to agree with Rand Paul.  The refusal of Democrats to allow due process for the President should be condemned.   How many witnesses did Democrats allow Republicans to call in the House?  Zero.

Democrats are terrified that their real corruption will be exposed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains