Schiff is still hiding his collusion with 'whistleblower'

Elizabeth Vaughn:

...
And Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-TX), a highly-skilled former federal prosecutor, responded. He wrote, “I know why @paulsperry_ It’s because I asked IG Atkinson about his “investigation” into the contacts between Schiff’s staff and the person who later became the whistleblower. The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions.”

Schiff is reluctant to release the testimony because it will further expose the fraudulent nature of the whistleblower’s claim. It will disclose the interaction between he and/or his staff and the whistleblower. Americans might learn too much about how this sausage was made.

The impeachment of a U.S. President is a big deal even if he has committed an impeachable offense. When the “impeachable offense” remains as undefined and appears as purely political as this one, it deserves careful public scrutiny. It demands transparency. Adam Schiff is trying to disenfranchise over 60 million voters and asks us simply to “trust him.”

Schiff’s impeachment inquiry is what it is. Even Congressional Democrats want it to be over with. The faster they vote to impeach, the better. Once the impeachment is handed over to the Senate, it will be Schiff and his co-conspirators on trial. Schiff will be called to testify under oath. And he’ll be joined by his accomplices which will include ICIG Michael Atkinson, and the star of the show, the whistleblower himself, who is believed to be Eric Ciaramella.

Former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden will be called as witnesses. Even the former Polish president who was a member of the Burisma board, says the company hired Hunter because of his father’s position and influence.

We’ve become so caught up in the testimonies of officials such as the pompous Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and the bitter Marie Yovanovitch that we’ve lost sight of the young man who started it.

No one has forgotten who he is. Ciaramella submitted his complaint for the sole purpose of triggering an impeachment inquiry. Schiff claims that his testimony is no longer necessary because so many have corroborated it. Conservative television host and writer Mark Levin recently explained why Ciaramella’s testimony is necessary. He said it’s necessary “for the same reason Monica’s blue dress was necessary.”
...

Schiff has much to hide.  That means he is going to be a witness eventually if this coup attempt goes to the Senate.  There he would also likely have his credibility challenged about the lies he told about evidence in the Russian collusion hoax.