CIA should be a major focus of who was behind Russian Collusion hoax

Paul Sperry:
Did a dirty intelligence op create the ‘collusion’ probe?

...
Barr’s probe of the probe will seek to answer several bedeviling questions.

First, what was CIA chief John Brennan up to in arranging secret interagency task force meetings on alleged collusion in the spring, summer and fall of 2016? He sent classified memos related to these meetings in envelopes to former FBI boss James Comey, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and national security adviser Susan Rice, according to a 2018 House Intelligence Committee report.

Barr will also want to find out how and why Brennan came to apprise Obama of highly classified info provided by a source close to Russian strongman Vladimir Putin — who, according to congressional investigators, was likely a Russian source recycled from a largely debunked dossier compiled by ex-British spook Christopher Steele for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Plus, did Brennan argue for using the dossier in early drafts of the task force’s much-hyped January 2017 intelligence assessment, which spread the narrative that Putin ordered the alleged Clinton campaign hacking to steal the election for Trump? ­Emails or other communiqués from Brennan are likely to establish that.

More generally, Barr will need to get his hands on case files put together by these agencies as well as the sourcing that informed them, including confidential-source reports summarizing briefings between FBI agents and the informants and assets they jointly handled with the CIA.

Barr should also press for FBI, CIA and State Department records related to Joseph Mifsud, the mysterious Maltese professor whose conversations with Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos allegedly triggered the original “collusion” probe.

The Obama administration’s inappropriate use of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act wiretaps has also been at the heart of this outrage, and Barr will want to uncover how that came about, as well.
...
There is much more.

Brennan certainly pushed the Russian collusion hoax beyond all reason even when it was clear that there was no evidence to support it.  Even as Mueller was preparing to close his investigation after bringing no cases against any Trump associate which supported the collusion theory, Brennan was still on liberal TV claiming there was collusion and that Trump was a Russian asset.l  His assertions were all dead wrong. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains