Questions for the media about their pushing of the Russian collusion hoax

Jack Hellner:
Since the media is back on the Russian collusion story, maybe we should assemble a panel consisting of White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, President Trump, and others in their camp, where they ask CNN's Jim Acosta, American Urban Radio Network's April Ryan, and others blue-check journalists a series of questions that they should be willing to answer. After all, they have been endlessly and breathlessly reporting on this fictional story for almost two years. And since Jim Acosta would rather be the news than report the news, it's time to give him what he wants.

Here goes:

Was there any actual evidence that the Trump team colluded with Russia on the election or was it fake from the start? What would the crime be if people associated with Trump talked to people from Russia? Didn't people surrounding Hillary Clinton talk with people from Russia?

If there was no crime, what would Trump have obstructed?

What do you think of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton paying as much as $10 million to create a fake dossier to destroy Trump?

What do you think of the Justice Department and the Obama administration using this fake dossier as an excuse to spy on people surrounding Trump?

Since there was never any actual evidence that the dossier was true, should the media have reported it as if it was?

Former FBI Director James Comey listed a series of criminal violations by Hillary that he never prosecuted her for. Shouldn't Hillary and others have been prosecuted for their clear violations of the law?

Didn't Hillary, the DNC and others obstruct the law when they destroyed computers and refused access to computers for hacking?

Shouldn't others at the FBI and in the Obama administration be investigated and possibly prosecuted for their obvious protection of Hillary and their targeting of Trump?

Shouldn't any president fire someone like Comey for his clear preferential treatment instead of doing his job?

Why did Obama issue a stand-down order in the summer of 2016 to his cyber security chief to stop investigating Russian hacking? Was he hiding something or obstructing justice?
...
What we do know is that despite all the stories run by the media suggesting there was some collusion with the Russians no evidence of such collusion has been found despite millions being spent by Mueller to find it.  Here is my question for the media.  Were you taken in by the Democrat/FBI hoax too or were you part of it?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more