Media bias appears to support the Democrat election theft model

Steve Berman:

When Kelly Ayotte lost her 2016 bid to keep her N.H. Senate seat, it was by 1017 votes. In a $100+ million race, the margin was vanishingly small, and Ayotte was within her rights to demand a full recount. Instead, she conceded.

New Hampshire's peculiar honor code doesn't look kindly upon claims of stolen elections. A year later, however, up to 5313 illegal votes from non-residents who may have voted in other states (primarily Democrat-dominated Massachusetts), showed that Ayotte very well could have prevailed had she pursued the 2018 Florida or Georgia route.

In 2016, the media was quick to call the race for Hassan, comparatively. But the AP still hasn't called the Georgia governor's race, despite the fact that Brian Kemp has a recount-proof, runoff-proof margin of victory that cannot be overcome by the remaining uncounted votes registered with the Georgia secretary of state's office.

But that doesn't stop Democrats from claiming there are thousands of "surprise" uncounted ballots in Stacey Abrams favor. All along, Democrats have built the false narrative of GOP, and Kemp's, "voter suppression" efforts. Nothing of the kind has really happened, and the Georgia media knows it. (See here, here, here, here and here.)

All along, the national media has been complicit, and in fact superintending, in Democratic efforts to subvert the election and to keep open legal options to overturn what should be a settled result.

In Florida, Andrew Gillum retracted his concession (at least Stacey Abrams has not yet taken that step, though she remains "open" to all options) because of Florida's mandatory automatic recount law. A "machine recount" is now underway, though Palm Beach County has admitted "it's impossible" for them to finish before the Thursday deadline.
...

The media is contributing the Florida's uncertainty by hyping the possibility of the governor's race and the Senate race, both respectively led by small margins by Republicans Ron DeSantis and Rick Scott, being overturned. They have been partisans on these races for months. (Here, here, here, and here.)

The Washington Post has been particularly friendly to Democrat incumbent Sen. Bill Nelson, acting as his mouthpiece in the post-election recount mess, marked by defiant left-leaning election officials in Broward County ignoring state laws and court orders.
...

In fact, the media is so invested in the narrative that Donald Trump and the Russians stole the 2016 election that they feel justified in giving Democrats a pass in actually trying to steal elections in 2018. The "blue wave" wasn't blue enough or wavy enough for liberals in the press, so they are just fine encouraging every close election to become "controversial."
...

When Democrats talk about "counting every vote" they do not exclude illegal votes like those used to defeat Ayotte in New Hampshire or made up after the4 fact votes like the Democrats are trying to manufacture in Georgia.  Nor is the Washington Post concerned about illegal votes.  It is a shame to see what has happened to the Post in recent years.  It has become not just a Democrat House organ but a thought leader of the Democrats with several op-ed writers contributing briefs for the Democrat point of view on a daily basis.

Here is an example of how Democrats in Broward County refused to count a timely filed absentee ballot from a military man in the @000 election and guess who ultimately refused to follow orders to count it--Brenda Snipes.