FBI agent quickly moved from Clinton investigation to trying to stop Trump's election

Washington Times:
FBI agent Peter Strzok put the Trump-Russia investigation on a fast track during the 2016 election season at the same time he was sending text messages to his lover condemning the Republican presidential candidate as an “idiot” and vowing to “stop” him.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, in a voluminous report, singled out as troubling Mr. Strzok’s decision to move quickly from working on Hillary Clinton’s email case to investigating Mr. Trump.

“In assessing Strzok’s decision to prioritize the Russia investigation … these text messages led us to conclude that we did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias,” Mr. Horowitz wrote.

Mr. Horowitz’s 500-plus-page report focused on the Clinton email saga, not Russia. A separate inquiry into how the FBI started and conducted the investigation into Russia election interference is continuing.

But because Mr. Strzok’s texts to former FBI counsel Lisa Page dealt with both, Mr. Horowitz examined Russia-connected messages. He condemned them.

“We were deeply troubled by text messages sent by Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations,” the inspector general said.

Mr. Strzok was a pivotal player. He was the FBI’s lead agent in the Clinton probe and then took the same role in Trump-Russia and opted to open a counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016.

What followed were a number of controversial decisions, such as embracing the Democratic Party-financed, anti-Trump dossier. The FBI also hired the dossier’s author, former British spy Christoper Steele, to continue investigating Mr. Trump after the November election. The FBI then fired Mr. Steele for leaking to news media.

Mr. Strzok’s role in the Steele narrative will be addressed in Mr. Horowitz’s next project. His Clinton report did not mention the dossier or the FBI’s use of it to acquire surveillance warrants on a Trump campaign volunteer.

Special counsel Robert Mueller fired Mr. Strzok in July 2017 after Mr. Horowitz apprised him of the Strzok-Page texts and their affair. Ms. Page worked on the Mueller team for about six months.

Mr. Strzok messaged Ms. Page in May 2017 that he was reluctant to join the Mueller team because he did not know whether the inquiry would amount to much. The message would indicate that after 10 months of investigating, FBI agents had not found evidence of Trump-Russia collusion.

“I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern there’s no big there there,” Mr. Strzok told his lover.

Mr. Horowitz’s Clinton report took special interest in Mr. Strzok’s decision to fast-track the Trump investigation. The inspector general focused on one of Mr. Strzok’s well-known messages — that “we can’t take that risk” of a Trump election win and that he had an “insurance policy” against it.

The FBI agent, who was demoted from counterintelligence to FBI human resources, claimed the comment was innocent. Republicans have wondered whether the “insurance policy” statement referred to the unproven dossier or the investigation itself.

Said Mr. Horowitz: “Strzok said the reference in his text message to an ‘insurance policy’ reflected his conclusion that the FBI should investigate the allegations thoroughly right away, as if Trump were going to win.”

How Mr. Strzok conducted the Trump investigation was influenced by news media indications that Mrs. Clinton was sure to win.
...
It looks like the animus toward Trump at the FBI led some at the highest levels to take actions which in hindsight to have created a much bigger scandal than the one they were ostensibly investigating.  It devolved into what looks like a coup attempt.

Conrad Black has more on the scandal at the FBI which he believes should result in indictments.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more