Can North Korea give evidence against Iran's attempt to create nuclear weapons delivery systems?

James Robbins:
Does the road to Tehran lead through Singapore? Hopes are high that next week’s summit between President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un will begin a process leading to the total, verifiable and irreversible denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. But North Korea can also play a major role in the broader global effort against nuclear proliferation.

When it comes to illicit nuclear weapons programs, North Korea is the undisputed master. Despite their best efforts, the administrations of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama failed to prevent Pyongyang from acquiring nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. The Kim dynasty manipulated negotiations, evaded sanctions, bluffed, begged, borrowed and stole its way into the nuclear club. And it did so despite having one of the weakest, most backward economies in the world.

So now we want to know how the regime did it, and most importantly, who else helped the regime to achieve that goal. National Security Advisor John Bolton was criticized for talking about a “Libya option” for North Korean denuclearization. His critics wrongly focused on Muammar el-Qaddafi’s grisly fate after his NATO-assisted overthrow and killing in 2011. But Qaddafi’s death was the product of a misguided Obama administration policy that wound up destabilizing Libya and turning it into a terrorist playground. Betraying Qaddafi was a serious net loss for the United States in the region, and Hillary Clinton’s strangely flippant comment, “We came, we saw, he died,” only worsened the situation. That was obviously not what Bolton meant.

The relevant Libyan option dates to 2003, when Bolton served as the undersecretary of state for verification and arms control. In December of that year, Qaddafi agreed to abandon his illicit nuclear weapons program and handed over tons of hardware and documents detailing every aspect of his undertakings. Revelations from this intelligence trove helped expose the nuclear proliferation ring run by Pakistani nuclear scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, which had boosted weapons programs in Libya, North Korea and Iran. Breaking up the Khan network was even more important than ending Qaddafi’s rudimentary nuclear program.

Yet the loss of support from Khan’s network did not prevent North Korea from eventually developing and testing nuclear weapons, even while suffering under harsh international sanctions. Thus, any denuclearization deal with Pyongyang must include giving U.S. analysts access to North Korea’s nuclear records, including information on how the Hermit Kingdom evaded sanctions, who it worked with to obtain nuclear components, and the extent to which it was collaborating with other countries or corrupt officials.

It is hardly surprising that Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad has rushed to schedule his own summit with Kim, since Syria was a part of the North Korean proliferation network. In September 2007, Israeli warplanes destroyed the al-Kibar plutonium reactor in the sparsely populated eastern Syrian governate of Deir ez-Zor in what they called “Operation Outside the Box.” The reactor had been designed and built by North Korean technicians, and ten of them were killed in the attack. Assad may be heading to Pyongyang looking for assurances from Kim that the details of the nuclear relationship between the two countries will be kept under wraps. The United States should insist otherwise.

Back then, an Iranian defector revealed that construction of the al-Kibar reactor was underwritten by Tehran. This points to a second, potentially much more revealing intelligence bonanza: exposing North Korea’s cooperation with Iran on nuclear and ballistic missile programs. North Korea has been Iran’s main supplier of missile technology, and may have been giving the Islamic Republic fissionable material as well. A leaked UN report from 2011 stated that the two countries were exchanging smuggled illegal missile parts. Iran’s top nuclear scientist, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahabadi, was reportedly present at North Korea’s third nuclear test in 2013 while working on a project to develop a warhead that could fit on North Korea’s missiles. An unnamed U.S. official speculated at the time that “it’s very possible that the North Koreans are testing for two countries.” Maybe now we can learn the answer to that question.
...
I have long suspected that the two rogue states were at a minimum cooperating in their attempt to build nuclear weapons and launch vehicles.   The Iranian missiles appear to be very similar in design to that of the North Koreans.  It is possible that they also cooperated on the design and construction of weapons.  North Korea has also been accused of selling WMD to the Syrian regime.  It will be interesting to see just how cooperative North Korea is beyond just its own denuclearization.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Democrats worried about 2018 elections

Two-thirds of uninsured uncertain about buying insurance

Dr. Ford symptoms of paranoia and the second front door