Over analyzing election results

NY Times:

A Year After Trump, Diversity Has Its Day

A transgender lawmaker in Virginia, a Sikh mayor in New Jersey and a refugee mayor in Montana: Were these Democratic victories a rebuke of President Trump or sign of change?
The left tends to worship a certain kind of diversity and is intolerant of other kinds, specifically ideological diversity. 

This analysis also tends to attribute results to conform to a prejudice against the President.  It is probably more likely that the winning candidate ran the best campaign.   Who would really vote for a person simply because that person thinks the creator assigned them the wrong sex organs?

Aside from wearing funny headgear Sikhs are pretty normal people who are not a threat to anyone.  I have never heard of a Sikh terror attack or mass murder.  Unlike radical Islam, they appear to be tolerant of other people's religious affiliation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Democrats worried about 2018 elections

Obama's hidden corruption that enriched his friends

The Christmas of the survivors of Trump's first year in office?