Cruz ran the best campaign--It wasn't enough

Washington Post:
Ted Cruz ran the best campaign of any Republican politician in the 2016 primary. It wasn't enough.

When Cruz got into the presidential race last March, his odds were long. His poll numbers, when he started the race, were lower than any eventual nominee since Bill Clinton. He was the junior senator from Texas, and, as we were repeatedly reminded, hated by his party.

But Cruz was very good at one thing: Political organizing. He made two very smart decisions that ensured he would be able to stick around: He kept his enemy Donald Trump close, and he hired staff that focused narrowly on the hard work of identifying and turning out voters.

The Trump thing was a gamble, apparently based in part on the idea that once Trump faltered -- as was inevitable! -- Cruz could scoop up his followers. In effect, what it allowed Cruz to do was hold onto a base of support that he built in his first Senate race and then expanded during the Hill fights against Obamacare that led to the shutdown. Trump didn't go after him, which likely helped Cruz as his team tried to expand that core of support outward.

By the time voting neared, Cruz's field operation was ready to go. I'm convinced it's why he won in Iowa, simply by figuring out who to target and then getting them to the caucuses. His long-term bet that he'd fare better with more religious and more conservative voters was a good one; even in Indiana on Tuesday he won among those who attend church more than once a week and among the very conservative voters, according to preliminary exit polls reported by CNN.
When Cruz started to gain critical mass with Republican voters, it was soft support predicated to a large degree on his not being Donald Trump. When Trump started winning by wide margins, that support fell away, and Cruz gave up.
It was not enough to overcome Trump's politics of fraud and invective.  Where Cruz may have been seen as abrasive by some of his Senate colleagues Trump was actually coarser and truly unhinged from the truth and reality.  A candidate untethered from the truth would have normally been in trouble, but the media rarely challenged him and gave him billions in free coverage.  That was too much to overcome.


Popular posts from this blog

Democrats worried about 2018 elections

Obama's hidden corruption that enriched his friends

The Christmas of the survivors of Trump's first year in office?