Cruz ran the best campaign--It wasn't enough

Washington Post:
Ted Cruz ran the best campaign of any Republican politician in the 2016 primary. It wasn't enough.

When Cruz got into the presidential race last March, his odds were long. His poll numbers, when he started the race, were lower than any eventual nominee since Bill Clinton. He was the junior senator from Texas, and, as we were repeatedly reminded, hated by his party.

But Cruz was very good at one thing: Political organizing. He made two very smart decisions that ensured he would be able to stick around: He kept his enemy Donald Trump close, and he hired staff that focused narrowly on the hard work of identifying and turning out voters.

The Trump thing was a gamble, apparently based in part on the idea that once Trump faltered -- as was inevitable! -- Cruz could scoop up his followers. In effect, what it allowed Cruz to do was hold onto a base of support that he built in his first Senate race and then expanded during the Hill fights against Obamacare that led to the shutdown. Trump didn't go after him, which likely helped Cruz as his team tried to expand that core of support outward.

By the time voting neared, Cruz's field operation was ready to go. I'm convinced it's why he won in Iowa, simply by figuring out who to target and then getting them to the caucuses. His long-term bet that he'd fare better with more religious and more conservative voters was a good one; even in Indiana on Tuesday he won among those who attend church more than once a week and among the very conservative voters, according to preliminary exit polls reported by CNN.
...
When Cruz started to gain critical mass with Republican voters, it was soft support predicated to a large degree on his not being Donald Trump. When Trump started winning by wide margins, that support fell away, and Cruz gave up.
...
It was not enough to overcome Trump's politics of fraud and invective.  Where Cruz may have been seen as abrasive by some of his Senate colleagues Trump was actually coarser and truly unhinged from the truth and reality.  A candidate untethered from the truth would have normally been in trouble, but the media rarely challenged him and gave him billions in free coverage.  That was too much to overcome.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more