What is J Street up to?

Amanda Carpenter:

An upstart group trying to displace the powerful American Israel lobby has attracted President Obama's national security adviser to its first big meeting next week, but the event is also being shunned by Israel's U.S. ambassador and several members of Congress because of its views and ties to controversial figures.

J Street was formed a year and half ago as a more liberal alternative to the nation's main pro-Israel lobbying organization, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, better known as AIPAC. J Street's executive director has said that he wants his group to be the "blocking back" for Mr. Obama's efforts to bring peace to the Middle East.

But by taking on the long-established AIPAC and the hawkish Israeli government, and by embracing individuals who have expressed hostility to Israel, J Street also has alienated some veteran Israel supporters in Washington. For example, one of next week's speakers is a Muslim activist who has said that Israel should be considered a suspect in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Twelve members of Congress who were initially listed on the conference's host committee of more than 160, including both senators from New York, have withdrawn their names.

Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Tuesday that he would not be able to make a scheduled Tuesday speaking slot because of a conflict, though his staff and J Street say they are hoping to reschedule his appearance at some other time during next week's three-day conference.

Rep. Howard Coble, a North Carolina Republican who removed his name from the host committee, said he was confused about the group's positions, although he elaborated that he did not feel misled.

"I have a consistently favorable pro-Israel voting record and if someone touts themselves as pro-Israel, I am very likely to join forces with them and that was my thinking with this group," he said. "Then I hear from my rabbi back home and others, and they assure me that this group is by no means on the same page with the mainstream Jewish community back in my district. And I didn't feel comfortable lending my name to that outfit."

But Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat, said that J Street is a bona fide pro-Israel organization.

...

One key difference between J Street and AIPAC is that the latter calibrates its public positions to reflect the current government in Israel, but J Street is liberal-leaning and has been critical of the center-right governing coalition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The Israeli Embassy said in a statement Tuesday about Ambassador Michael Oren's invitation to address J Street's meeting next week that it would send an observer and "will follow [J Street's] proceedings with interest."

"In response to the question about J Street's invitation to participate in its conference, the Embassy of Israel has been privately communicating its concerns over certain policies of the organization that may impair the interests of Israel," the embassy said.

Those concerns range from J Street's position that the U.S. should not impose new sanctions on Iran to the group's tepid criticism of a U.N. report that concluded that Israel deliberately targeted civilians in the Gaza war.

...

The group certainly has associated itself with some left wing kooks and anti Israel Muslim groups. I am not sure what they are trying to accomplish, but it is not clear to me that they have Israel's interest at heart. They seem to be on the side of those critical of Israel. They may not be self hating, but they certainly don't act like those who support Israel.