ACORNS's organized voter crime
There is more.Ohio. Nevada. Connecticut. Indiana. Michigan. Missouri. New Mexico. North Carolina. Wisconsin.
That's the list of states where investigations are under way into allegations of fraud in the new-voter registrations collected by Barack Obama's preferred collection of "community organizers," the radical extremists of ACORN.
In some cases, however, ACORN is getting some high-placed help - from the (Democratic) state officials whose job should include uncovering voting fraud.
In Ohio, for example, a federal judge ruled that Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner is violating the law by refusing to allow county election boards to verify the identities of voters newly registered by ACORN.
"It is hard to imagine a public interest more compelling than safeguarding the legitimacy of the election of the president of the United States," ruled Judge George Smith.
But Brunner - who's appointed an ACORN rep to one of her advisory committees - claims that the complaints are just "allegations that don't have any evidence to support them."
This despite the reports by The Post's Jeane MacIntosh, who in Ohio's Cuyahoga County found one 19-year-old who admitted he'd registered to vote 72 times with ACORN in return for cash and cigarettes - a felony in that state.
Two other voters told MacIntosh that ACORN persuaded them into multiple registrations - one of them having signed up to vote "10 to 15" times.
The Wall Street Journal reports that ACORN has registered new Buckeye voters who just happen to be named Mary Poppins, Dick Tracy and Jive Turkey.
And that's just in Ohio.
In the Indianapolis metro area, ACORN has been so successful that the number of registered voters now stands at 105 percent of the voting-age population.
All in all, ACORN has filed 3 million new voter registrations since 2004 - more than enough votes to decide a close election.
And where do you suppose those votes collected by ACORN are going?
Consider:
* ACORN's political-action committee has endorsed Barack Obama.
* Obama's presidential campaign has paid an ACORN front $832,000 for get-out-the-vote activities.
...
There is also a curious silence from the Obama camp about the fraud being perpetrated on the election in their behalf. It is another demonstration of the the lack of integrity in Obama's character. It is the way he moved through the Chicago machine without ever challenging its embedded corruption.
Al long as Obama is the beneficiary he is willing to look the other way at corrupt activities. That is why he could work with Rezko and Ayers.
If a RICO case is finally brought against this corrupt organization, the prosecutors should consider naming Ohio's Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner as an accessory and aider and abettor. Her attempts to thwart a review of ACORN's conduct suggest someone willing to tolerate vote fraud to achieve her objectives.
If the idea is to have a kind of coupe, and to use a crisis to suspend things, then acorns behavior dovetails with that.
ReplyDeletethat and donors is creating a situation where if obama wins, the presidency may be taken away for too many violations on his side in election law.
if that happens, i will guarantee that there will be rioting of some sort by many people. with a undercurrent of random incidents with opportunity. (like broken windows, and violent attacks late when its easier to get away with it).
Acorns actions are not very subtle, and so it may be that they want the argument as to how a certain group would never allow another group to ever actually take the office. then we are off in a rift that may never heal as long as its picked on for the next 100 years. so much rhetoric is already feeding into it.
one shouldnt always think that the inexplicable or what appears to be an error to you, is incompetence.