The left's embrace of the Arab Pol Pots

Hugh Hewitt:

Peter Rodman has a column on the aftermath of the American abandonment of Vietnam which is timely since the old legion of anti-war propagandists are assembling on the virtual Mall in response to the president's speech yesterday. When I heard a radio interview with octogenarian Stanley Karnow last night --was it the first time he had been rung up by the MSM since the Bill Clinton-dodged-the-draft stories of 1992?-- I knew the president had not just touched a nerve, he'd touched the nerve in American history: Complicity in foreseeable genocide is, after all, a big deal.

This is the ghost haunting the anti-war left, and the left shudders and screams whenever it floats into the room. All those millions of Cambodians didn't have to die, and all those Boat People didn't have to sail into death or exile. The Kennedys didn't have to topple Diem any more than Senators Levin and Clinton have to work to force the toppling the Maliki. And the Democratic Congress elected in 1974 didn't have to abandon South Vietnam to North Vietnam.

America's Vietnam policy of intervention, manipulation, and then withdrawal represented a series of choices. The Democrats of those years, urged on by a hard left anti-war front, finally made a choice to leave, a choice with awful consequences.

This is the crucial point: The Democratic Party and their supporters made that choice, cheered on by the anti-war left. They own the consequences.

...
They may own it but you can bet when it happens they will be saying "Me no Alamo. Me no Goliad" which is Texan for not taking responsibility for a blood bath. Even while acknowledging that their policies will create one, don't expect Democrats to take responsibility. They are already planning to blame George Bush for what happens in the event of a defeat they are desperate to cause. That is why it is foolish for any Republicans to go along with the Democrats desires for defeat. There is zero benefit for any Republican to support the Democrats on this issue. Zero.

At least the President has found a Vietnam analogy the neo quagmirest don't embrace.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility