Questions avoided
Perhaps the Democrats have considered the consequences of their policy on Iraq and they just don't care. That is what this none response appears to imply. Hat tip to Larwyn.Jake Tapper Presses Harry Reid On What Becomes of Iraqis After His Withdrawal, Gets No Response
I've said it before, I'll say it again: Jake Tapper, former reporter for the obnoxiously leftist Salon, is a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, but unlike most of his liberal colleagues, he actually attempts to do his job and ask difficult questions of Democrats rather than acting as an on-the-payroll campaign consultant for them.
TAPPER: With all due respect, Senator, you didn't answer my question.REID: OK. This is not a debate.
TAPPER: Will the Iraqis be safer?
REID: We're answering questions. (calling on someone else) Yes, young man? Anyone else have a question?
Follow-up questions for Democrats when they evade blunt questions about the deficiencies in their "plans" and the dubious assumptions contained within, rather than just letting a Democrat give his focus-grouped answer without challenge or further questioning! What a concept!!!
...
The Washington Times Editorial also looks at Reid's evasions. "Right now they have no plan. They have not even attempted to make the necessary strategic arguments and they have ignored the humanitarian imperatives. Any erstwhile voice of compassion for Rwanda, Bosnia, Darfur and the host of post-Cold War tragedies should be ashamed if their preference for Iraq today risks what Ambassador Ryan Crocker, who should know, fears will be a bloodbath if and when U.S. forces leave precipitously."
Their plan is to blame it on Bush.
Comments
Post a Comment