Media bias watch

A vote against cloture on a filibuster does not shut off debate, but keeps it open. So why did the Washington Post describe it this way in a headline:

Republicans Stall Senate's Debate on War
And, the NY Times described it this way:

Republican Senators Block Debate on Iraq Resolution

Back when the Democrats were engaging in "extended debate" on judicial nominations did either paper accuse them of trying stall or block debate?

What really happened is that the Republicans wanted to debate and vote on alternative resolutions and the Democrats wanted to block debate on those issues and prevent a vote. As is usually the case the Democrats are trying to thwart democracy in the Senate.

The Houston Chronicle shows what a fair headline would say:

Senate at odds on which Iraq resolution to debate
That is not so hard is it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility