Democrats try to lose war but avoid responsibility
AP/NY Times:
Democrats face a host of risks as they move toward more substantive steps to tie President Bush's hands with funding restrictions on the Iraq war.The fact is that the Democrat party has decided to be defined by its anti war puke base. That is who Murtha is and his despicable plan for losing the war in Iraq is a wholly owned Democrat policy. Frost is typical of Democrats who want to lose but not take responsibility for the loss. If they really want to put responsibility for any loss on Bush they should let him do what he thinks is necessary to win. Otherwise, they are just giving hope to a losing enemy and making the job of our troops harder. They should never be forgiven for this despicable betrayal.
Leaders are wary of allowing the more intense anti-war activists define the party's image.
Simmering divisions within the ranks over how soon to move -- and how far to go -- could quickly diminish a tactical victory this week on a resolution criticizing Bush's conduct of the war.
''There are those in our caucus who would rather we not do anything, and there will be people who want to see us extricate ourselves overnight. We'll have to balance those interests,'' said Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, House Democrats' chief vote-counter. ''We're not going to sit anybody out, but we will have to decide how to weigh those things.''
Senior House Democrats will huddle next week during a congressional break to plot strategy on their next move, which will be seeking to restrict some of Bush's Iraq war spending by establishing high readiness and equipment targets for troops and requiring those targets be met first.
Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, tasked by Democrats to direct the next step, says his approach ''stops the surge, for all intents and purposes,'' and would ''force a redeployment -- not by taking money away, by redirecting money.''
Former Rep. Martin Frost, D-Texas, said Democrats have made a ''very clear point'' this week by putting the House on record against Bush's troop buildup and now must be careful not to overplay their hand by seeking to cut off funding or limit deployments right away.
''They don't want to be a scapegoat for the Bush administration's failures,'' Frost said. ''This is Bush's war, and there should be no confusion about who's war it is, and Democrats should not set themselves up to have that done to them.''
Frost said he did not want to ''prejudge'' Murtha's effort to restrict funds, but cautioned that Democrats should not yield to intense pressure by outside anti-war groups for swift action to end the conflict.
Democratic leaders ''will have to decide how to deal with the anti-war groups in the months ahead,'' Frost said.
...
Comments
Post a Comment